Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:VIP)
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!
- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 02:26 on 30 April 2025 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
[edit]- Gusopapi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- 108.54.162.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- This needs review. Izno (talk) 02:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 113.11.82.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism on Bangladeshi film article. See this and this. Warned several times but today they did an unsourced edit here it is. Mehedi Abedin 02:24, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:243:1700:6760:BC9D:DEE5:2775:540A (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Disney, rapid, multiple pages
- @Augmented Seventh: While there are some issues with their editing, I'm not sure this is all vandalism. The "Mickeypalooza" content being removed was added by an editor repeatedly blocked for unsourced edits (e.g., [1], [2], [3]). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Noted. Augmented Seventh🎱 23:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Mat27fr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) WP:SPA that removes content from Quebec article. Wilfredor (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is clearly someone who created an account for this, how am I going to argue with an account that initially has a clear objective? Wilfredor (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: You can discuss the disagreement using the article talk page or their user talk page. If you can't come to consensus, then try dispute resolution. They started a talk page discussion on Talk:Racism in Quebec. In any case, this isn't obvious vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback, I will try it Wilfredor (talk) 02:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: You can discuss the disagreement using the article talk page or their user talk page. If you can't come to consensus, then try dispute resolution. They started a talk page discussion on Talk:Racism in Quebec. In any case, this isn't obvious vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:46, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is clearly someone who created an account for this, how am I going to argue with an account that initially has a clear objective? Wilfredor (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2605:A601:AA98:E500:24B5:8F61:919F:A7CC (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and other IPS in this range. Persistent removal of valid source requests on Los Angeles International Airport. The Banner talk 02:23, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- PoopyTrump (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. TLJ7863 (talk) 02:26, 30 April 2025 (UTC)